Footpaths before flyovers: a walkable city is a working city
The shortest infrastructure argument there is — most trips are short, and short trips deserve safe feet.
Count your own trips for a week and a truth appears: most of them are short — the school drop, the market run, the bus stop. The city's real transport network is the footpath, and we have surrendered it.
A footpath that disappears into parking, hawking and rubble does not remove the walkers; it moves them onto the road, where they become the 'pedestrian problem' the next flyover promises to solve.
The economics are lopsided in walking's favour: a kilometre of continuous, shaded, level footpath costs a rounding error of elevated infrastructure — and serves every citizen, from schoolchild to grandparent, every single day.
Build the flyovers where they are truly needed. But audit every big project with one small question first: can a ten-year-old walk to school under it safely? Cities that answer yes tend to work.



Reader Comments
Comments are reviewed by our desk before they appear. Sign in with your mobile number to join the discussion.